Legal Opinion

Howell v. Crutchfield

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 15, 1831Published

Motion for a rule.

1Opinion of the CourtEskridge, J.

This is a motion made by Orson V. Howell, an attorney at law of this court, for a rule against Peter T. Crutchfield, the judge of the county court of Pulaski county, to show cause why a mandamus should not be granted by this court, commanding him to amend the record in a certain proceeding in the county court against O. V. Howell, for an alleged contempt offered by him to the county court. The plaintiff in this motion states in his affidavit that the record of the proceedings in the ease above stated is imperfect and incomplete, and entirely omits and fails to show several material parts of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Daniel v. County Court of WarrenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1809

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API