Legal Opinion

Fry v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided October 1, 1998No. 14-97-00485-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YATES, Justice.

This is an attorney discipline matter. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Commission for Lawyer Discipline (“the Commission”) on the issue of professional misconduct by Gerald Fry. We affirm.

In January of 1994, Fry was contacted by Ervin McLeggan to discuss the possibility of McLeggan retaining Fry for the appeal of a federal court conviction in Pennsylvania. Fry claims that while he was not the attorney of record for McLeggan in the criminal case, he was hired “to advise him concerning his case, to be the attorney of record for the sentencing, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. MMP, Ltd. v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Neely v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  2. Olsen v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  3. Thomas J. Sibley, P.C. v. Brentwood Investments Development Co., L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2011
  4. 2027 South Austin Street, LLC and Paul B. Christy v. LaTour Condominiums, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2021
  5. Allied Mortgage Capital Corporation and Jason Clint Price v. Advantage Investors Mortgage Corporation and Access Lending Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API