A.W. Fenton Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Laweence, Judge:
The above two protests, which were consolidated for trial, relate to several importations of galvanized wire fencing, which were classified in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 397), as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739, supplemented by T.D. 52820, or by the Sixth Protocol of supplementary concessions to said general agreement, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, and assessed with duty at the rate of 25 per centum or 21 per centum ad valorem, depending upon the date of entry.
P…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Newman v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Cadwalader v. ZehSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Arthur v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- American Sugar Refining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Vandegrift v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.