Legal Opinion

Ball v. Morton

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 12, 1816Published

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

unanimously. The record of Stockton v. Haughey’s Administrator is made part of the case in the statement pronarratio of the plaintiffs below. They say that Bines and his sureties were liable, in consequence of a sale made by Bines of the lands of Haughey on Stockton’s judgment. There as plaintiffs below have referred to, and stated this judgment, and the proceeding of Stockton, they have spread it on the record; they make it part of their case, and consequently it comes properly before this Court, just as if they had recited the whole of it. It cannot be stricken out of the record.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. ChaffantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1803

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API