Legal Opinion
In Re Conservatorship for Rich
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 14, 1975No. 7620PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YEAGLEY, Associate Judge:
This is a suit by appellant, a member of the bar of this court who appeared pro se, for the allowance of attorney’s fees from the estate of Charlotte Rich, an adult ward of the court.
The facts, as alleged in the uncontro-verted petition for fees, show that Mrs. Rich shared, with six other heirs-at-law, the estate of Susie F. Walsh, deceased, of which the appellant had been the administrator. This estate consisted primarily of three parcels of real property of which Mrs. Rich inherited an undivided one-quarter. Appellant alleged that “on behalf of all of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Henry S. Bloomgarden v. Charles B. CoyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Montes v. Naismith and Trevino Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Warner Corporation v. Magazine Realty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
- Dierickx v. WisehartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
3Cited by19 opinions
- Edmund J. Flynn Co. v. LaVayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Vereen v. ClayborneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Virtual Defense & Development International, Inc. v. Republic of MoldovaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Novecon Ltd. v. Bulgarian-American Enterprise FundCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- TVL Associates v. a & M Construction Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.