Legal Opinion

United States v. Burl

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided July 30, 1946No. 16240PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHAM, District Judge.

For a general statement of the case I quote -the first paragraph of the memorandum filed herein by the United States Attorney: “Abraham Burl was indicted and Mose Allen executed sbond .on which he was released. At the time of his indictment in this Court, Burl was then at liberty on a bond given in a state case in Missouri. After his release on bond in this District he returned to Missouri where he lived and his bondsman there caused him to be surrendered and he was sentenced on the charge there pending. He was in jail in St. Louis and therefore did not appear when his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Ponzi v. FessendenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Beavers v. HaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Cline v. Frink Dairy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. D'ArgentoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964
  2. McCaleb v. Peerless Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1965
  3. United States of America, Indiana Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance Company and Aaa Southern Arizona Bonding Service v. Eduardo Martan-GastelumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API