Wooldridge v. Gilman
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after stating the facts). The primary rule of construction in the interpretation of a will is to ascertain the intention of the testator, according to the meaning of the words he has used, deduced from a. consideration of the' whole will and a comparison of its various clauses in the light of the situation and circumstances which surrounded the testator when the instrument was executed. Bloom v. Strauss, 73 Ark. 56; and Colton v. Colton, 127 U. S. 300.
No hard and fast rule can be laid down to determine when precatory words will be construed to create a trust; but the intention is to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Colton v. ColtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Webb v. WebbSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Bloom v. StraussSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
- Cook v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- O'Brien v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pletner v. Southern Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Cross v. ManningSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- McLane v. Chancey, AdministratorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Park v. HollomanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- Weeks v. WeeksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.