Legal Opinion

Wooldridge v. Gilman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 18, 1926PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). The primary rule of construction in the interpretation of a will is to ascertain the intention of the testator, according to the meaning of the words he has used, deduced from a. consideration of the' whole will and a comparison of its various clauses in the light of the situation and circumstances which surrounded the testator when the instrument was executed. Bloom v. Strauss, 73 Ark. 56; and Colton v. Colton, 127 U. S. 300.

No hard and fast rule can be laid down to determine when precatory words will be construed to create a trust; but the intention is to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Colton v. ColtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Webb v. WebbSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  3. Bloom v. StraussSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  4. Cook v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  5. O'Brien v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pletner v. Southern Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  2. Cross v. ManningSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  3. McLane v. Chancey, AdministratorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  4. Park v. HollomanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  5. Weeks v. WeeksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API