In the Matter of the Paternity and Maternity of Infant T.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
In this nonadversarial proceeding, M.F. is the biological father of Infant T. Infant T. was born to S.T., who acted as a surrogate for M.F. and an unknown egg donor. During the pregnancy, M.F., S.T., and S.T.’s husband, C.T., jointly filed an agreed petition with the trial court to establish M.F.’s paternity and to “disestablish” S.T.’s maternity. The trial court denied the agreed petition and certified its order for interlocutory appeal, which we accepted. We address the following two issues 1
1. Whether the trial court erred when it denied M.F.’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- K.S. v. R.S.Indiana Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re the Paternity of E.M.L.G.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Northern Indiana Railway Co. v. Lincoln National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
- In Re Paternity of SRIIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Paternity of H.J.B. Ex Rel. Sutton v. BoesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Paternity & Maternity of Infant T.Indiana Supreme Court · 2013
- In re the Paternity & Maternity of Infant T.Indiana Supreme Court · 2013
- In the Matter of the Paternity of A.D., State of Indiana Ex. Rel., E.M.W. v. J.M.D. (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- People v. NitzIllinois Supreme Court · 2006