Legal Opinion

Vier ex rel. Torry v. State Office for Services to Children & Families

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 31, 1999No. CA A104361Published

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Petitioner challenges the validity of a number of temporary rules adopted by the State Office for Services to Children and Families (SCF). ORS 183.400(4)(c). Petitioner argues that the rules are invalid because they were not adopted in compliance with applicable rulemaking procedures. We affirm.

In 1997, the Oregon Legislature adopted ORS 419B.192, which governs the placement of children by SCF. That statute provides:

“(1) If the court finds that a child is in need of placement or continuation in substitute care, there shall be a preference given to placement with relatives and persons who have…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burke v. Children's Services DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Fremont Lumber Co. v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Fulgham v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API