Legal Opinion

Standard Oil Co. v. Murray

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1921No. Docket No. 101PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from St. Clair; Tappan (Harvey), J. Bill by the Standard Oil Company against Mary C. Murray for the specific performance of a land contract.. From a decree for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Bill for specific performance of an option given by defendant to plaintiff to sell to it certain premises in the city of Port Huron and accepted by plaintiff. It appears, that March 14, 1919, J. G. O’Brien, an agent of plaintiff, was in Port Huron looking for sites for service stations and had his. attention called to the premises in suit, and finding that defendant was. owner thereof and resided thereon he visited her, and she sent him to see H. P. Warwick, a real estate dealer with whom she had listed her property; for sale at a price of $8,000.

Mr. O’Brien called upon Mr. Warwick and was…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Retan v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Kappelman v. BowieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. American Oil Company v. CareyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1965
  4. Barryton State Savings Bank v. DurkeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Kinney v. KinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API