Legal Opinion

Shamokin Lumber & Construction Co. v. Line Mountain Coal Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 28, 1924No. Appeal, 2PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

The question is whether the sheriff’s return is sufficient. After the writ was returned, plaintiff filed a statement endorsed with a rule to file an affidavit of defense as required by the Practice Act, and, no affidavit being filed, took judgment for want of an appearance and an affidavit of defense, assessed damages, and issued a fi. fa. on which the sheriff levied.

To contest the service, defendant then filed a petition, inter alia, setting forth that the service of the writ and the statement were illegal, and praying that execution be stayed, the service set aside and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Park Brothers & Co. v. Oil City Boiler WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Frank P. Miller Paper Co. v. Keystone Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rittenberg v. Stein SpechtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. O'Connor v. Daily Publishing Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County1930
  3. Rosengrant v. Frank Martz Coach Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Stauffer Insurance Agency v. Koenigsburg, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1932
  5. Veratti v. Salvatore, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API