Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Blackwell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 14, 2000No. A00A0073Published

1DissentAndrews, Presiding Judge

I must respectfully dissent because the majority has, in essence, created a complex federal constitutional argument for Blackwell, assumed and speculated about facts not proven below to analyze it on Blackwell’s behalf, and then ruled in his favor on it, even though the trial court did not. The majority concludes that the State violated his Fifth Amendment due process rights because the Crime Lab,37 in the normal course of its business and without Blackwell having availed himself of testing the urine as provided in the consent order for such testing, destroyed the urine after 12 months.

Pursuan…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wellons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  2. Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. Brantley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  5. Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API