Rostran v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1ConcurrenceSalter, J.
I reluctantly concur in the result in this case, but write separately to emphasize again (a) that the Agency for Workforce Innovation should adhere to its own rules and procedures in unemployment compensation benefits appeals, and (b) that claimants should be allowed more time within which to seek advice and to prepare and file their administrative appeals, so that such appeals are resolved on the merits rather than through procedural defaults.
Ms. Rostran’s claim for unemployment compensation benefits was initially granted by the Agency. She had worked for a CVS pharmacy for over four years…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arensen v. Florida Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Dakers v. STATE, UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Grover v. Brumell Investigations, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Lopez v. A Aaron Super Rooter, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011