Legal Opinion

Leebaert v. Harrington

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 13, 2003No. Docket No. 02-7399PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SACK, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Turk Leebaert (“Leebaert”) argues that his constitutional right to direct the upbringing and education of his child requires the defendants, upon his request, to excuse his minor son, Corky Leebaert, from attending health education classes at a public school administered by the defendants. Leebaert further argues that the right so to excuse his son is, as a matter of constitutional law, “fundamental.” His son may therefore be required to attend classes teaching the health curriculum only if the requirement that he do so withstands constitutional “strict…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Parker v. Town of LexingtonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  2. Robert E. Blau, Individually and as Parent of Amanda Blau, a Minor v. Fort Thomas Public School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. Skoros v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. Combs v. Homer-Center School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Leebaert v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API