Legal Opinion

In re Condemnation by the Delaware River Port Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LORD, Senior Judge.

This case presents a very interesting question in the area of eminent domain law in *767Pennsylvania. The question is simply stated, but the solution presents difficulties.

The question is whether an abutting property owner, or one in the position of an abutting owner, may recover condemnation damages when the erection of sound barriers on a highway obstructs the view from the highway of a billboard erected on the property. The importance of the question is obvious in view of the recent increase in the use of sound barriers and the probability that many of them will interfere…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Hession Condemnation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Wolf v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. In re 1301 Filbert Ltd. PartnershipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Berk v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Sienkiewicz v. PennDOT, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2003
  4. Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API