Legal Opinion

Klug v. Munce

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1907No. 5362; No. 3011 C. APublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Weld County. Eon. Chas. E. Southard, Judge. - Action by William Mnnee against John P. Klug. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Goddard

1. It is contended by counsel for appellant that the court erred in admitting’ in evidence the chattel mortgage executed by Jesse and William Munce, Sr., because it failed to specifically describe the marks and brands, or otherwise describe the horses, so as to enable third parties to identify them. We think this contention is unwarranted. The color and ages of the horses are given, and referring to *279the brands the language used is “branded with Sterling’s brand.” We think this is sufficient to put a party upon inquiry to ascertain what Sterling’s brand was, and whether or not the reversed S…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Norman Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  2. Transamerica Corp. v. MerrionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  3. Longmont Farmers' Milling & Elevator Co. v. MulvaneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  4. Fisher v. Norman Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API