Legal Opinion

United States v. Lacey

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided July 8, 1991No. 89-10054-01PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CROW, District Judge.

This case comes before the court upon the motion of American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida (American Bankers) to set aside the judgment for bond forfeiture. The Government opposes American Bankers’ motion.

FACTS

On July 6, 1989, Richard Ray Lacey was charged by information with violations of federal drug laws. On July 12, 1989, Richard Ray Lacey was released on bond subject to the usual conditions, including the agreement to appear for all scheduled court appearances. The bond was set at $100,000 and the conditions of release required the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Clemente Marquez v. Jean Wilson, Noel Dion, John H. Wimberly and Fred Joe Moreno, Sureties-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. Charles W. Nolan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
  3. James Carlock Babb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  4. United States v. Ramon Navarrete-Martinez, and Concerning Douglas Riddle, Professional Surety-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard Ray Lacey, American Bankers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. LaceyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API