Legal Opinion

Matson v. Town of Caledonia

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

Plaintiffs concede that they have no right to maintain this action if the defendant railway company can acquire the land in question by condemnation. The railway company does not possess such power. The chapter of the statutes which confers the right to condemn provides that “the general power of condemnation conferred in this chapter does not extend to property owned by ... a municipality. ...” Sub. (1), sec. 32.03, Stats. The property here in question is owned by the municipality and is therefore not subject to condemnation.

All parties concede that the town possesses the power to acquire…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Linden Land Co. v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Mulberger v. BeurhausWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Williams v. City of OconomowocWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Patrick v. BlakeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Stuart v. City of NeenahWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Klema v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API