People v. Muir
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKaus, J.
A jury convicted defendant of assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury. (Pen. Code, § 245.)
On appeal the judgment is mainly attacked on the basis that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. The facts are confusing and the evidence that it was defendant who committed a brutal attack on the victim, Mrs. Anderson, is admittedly circumstantial, but after a thorough review of the record we cannot say that the jury unreasonably rejected “all that undermines confidence” in the prosecution’s case. (People v. Hall, 62 Cal.2d 104, 112 [41 Cal.Rptr. 284, 396 P.2d…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. TallmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. DayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- People v. McCaffreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- People v. FuentesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. EllisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. CovinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- People v. GarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. YeatsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.