Melendez v. Rivera
Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands
1Opinion of the CourtEltman, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
I. INTRODUCTION
Following the settlement of this custody action, the respondent moved for attorney’s fees, pursuant to 5 V.I.C. § 541(b)(1)1. The petitioners argue that there is no prevailing party by virtue of the settlement, though they too seek attorney’s fees in the alternative. Under the circumstances of this case, attorney’s fees are not precluded by the agreement of the parties or the custody issue, and an award will be made to the respondent.
FACTS
Pursuant to an October 22, 1980, divorce decree, the respondent, Nitza Rivera, was awarded legal and physical…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arthur Ray PARHAM, Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Lucerne Investment Company v. Estate Belvedere, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Mabel Dale Ingvoldstad ex rel. Meyer v. Kings Wharf Island Enterprises, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1983
- Trailer Marine Transportation Corp. v. Charley's Trucking, Inc.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bluebeard's Castle, Inc. v. HodgeDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2009
- Joann's Launder Center, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1995
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Juan GarciaSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2020
- El Fenix de Puerto Rico, Inc. v. DallasDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1994