Talbot v. Gingras
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.
The bill contains no offer to redeem. It asks that the foreclosure sale, no deed having been delivered to the purchaser, be set aside because no notice was given to the plaintiffs, and the price was less than the value of the property. The master to whose report no exceptions were taken, finds, that the foreclosure because of default in payment of principal was in compliance with law and in accordance with the conditions of the mortgage, and that there was no concealment of the time or place of sale or of the intention of the defendants, the mortgagees, to foreclose.
The plaintiff Rose…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bon v. GravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Austin v. HatchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Taylor v. WeingartnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- King v. BronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Wing v. HayfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gadreault v. ShermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- White v. MacarelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Barry v. General Mortgage & Loan Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926