Legal Opinion

Stark v. Molod Spitz DeSantis & Stark, P.C.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 2007PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Read, J.

Beginning in 1996, plaintiff Linda A. Stark became an equity partner in defendant law firm, Molod Spitz DeSantis & Stark, EC. (now Molod Spitz & DeSantis). In 2000, plaintiff withdrew as an equity partner and became a contract partner under the terms of an employment agreement that she negotiated with the firm. The agreement provided for either party to terminate it upon 60 days’ written notice. Further, “all controversies and claims” arising out of the “transaction^] contemplated by” the agreement or its “construction, performance or breach” were to “be determined…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Teitelbaum Holdings, Ltd. v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Flores v. Lower East Side Services Center, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. De Sapio v. KohlmeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Smith Barney Shearson Inc. v. SacharowNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Sherrill v. Grayco Builders, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. People v. Coventry First LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Cole v. Jersey City Medical CenterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Excel Imaging, P.C.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  4. Rita Cusimano v. Andrew v. Schnurr Bernard v. StrianeseNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Markowits v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API