Legal Opinion

Bourn v. James

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1974No. 39286PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

This is a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. There is no issue concerning the applicability of the act to the defendant who is a rancher and farmer engaged in the purchase and sale of livestock. He lives at Ericson, Nebraska, and has a yard there where he keeps cattle. The plaintiff was employed to work at the yard and help care for the cattle. His duties included feeding and vaccinating the cattle and doing the regular chores.

The plaintiff lived in a small trailer owned by the defendant and located at the yard on the defendant’s property. He was injured by a fire while asleep…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oline v. NEBRASKA NATURAL GAS COMPANYNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Hannon v. J. L. Brandeis & Sons, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deatherage v. International Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Gilbert v. MaheuxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. Wallace v. Green Thumb, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API