Legal Opinion
Fried v. Cahn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 3, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.
The action is by an attorney against another attorney, Cahn, and the executors of one Miriam Isaacs, deceased.
On August 8, 1925, Miriam Isaacs entered into a written contract with one Dr. Schmuck for the purchase of certain real property in the village of Lawrence, Nassau county, and paid $20,000 on account of the purchase price. In that transaction she was represented by the defendant Cahn. Subsequently she concluded that the purchase was an unfavorable one and, desiring to recede from it, employed the plaintiff for that purpose. Negotiations were almost concluded between the plaintiff,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barnes v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Isaacs v. SchmuckNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Lynch v. CongerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Bundy v. McLeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Isaacs v. SchmuckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
3Cited by7 opinions
- Benjamin v. KoeppelNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Carter v. Katz, Shandell, Katz & ErasmousNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- Sterling v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- In re the Estate of AbreuNew York Surrogate's Court · 1996
- Cohen v. BairdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.