Legal Opinion

Bannister v. Lollis, Mayor

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 22, 1937No. 14455PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

W. H. Bannister brought his petition in the original jurisdiction of this Court seeking to enjoin the town council of the town of Honea Path from issuing and selling bonds to raise funds for use in sewage improvements, and the surface treatment of certain streets of the town.

It appears from the petition that the petitions signed by the freeholders of the town asking for the election prayed that it might be submitted to the electors to determine whether the town should issue and sell bonds in the amount of $17,707.00 to raise funds…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Perry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Board of Com'rs v. Keene Five-Cents Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  3. City of Cheyenne v. State ex rel. RollinsWyoming Supreme Court · 1908
  4. City of Gladstone v. ThroopCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  5. Dick v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coward v. Nettles, MayorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API