Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Janzen

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 2001No. 35,288-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

pPEATROSS, Judge.

This appeal arises out of a dispute over the abandonment of a part of Third Street and proposed zoning changes of certain property in Benton, Louisiana (“subject property”). Two ordinances were enacted by the Benton Board of Aldermen: (1) Ordinance No. 345 of 2000, which changed the zoning of the subject property; and (2) Ordinance No. 342 of 2000, which abandoned a portion of Third Street. The validity of these ordinances constitutes the majority of this appeal; the trial court found both ordinances to be void due to procedural defects in their enactments. For the reasons…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Richards v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Robert J. Meza v. General Battery Corporation and Provident Life and Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. Welch v. Crown Zellerbach Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  4. Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  5. Avenue Plaza, LLC v. FalgoustSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Certified Finance, Inc. v. CunardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API