Legal Opinion

Johnson & Smith v. Farnum

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1876PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Injunction. Sales. Lien. Rescission. Debtor and creditor. Before Judge Kiddoo. Terrell county. At Chambers, December 3d, 1875. Reported in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Judge.

A debtor made an assignment for the benefit of his creditors, but inserted a condition that they must relinquish their claims, or treat them as fully paid, in order to take the benefit of it. Shortly thereafter certain creditors complained by bill of this assignment, and prayed for injunction and receiver. They alleged that certain of their debts were not due; that the goods purchased from them were bought while the debtor was insolvent and when he knew that he would be unable to pay for them; that some of these goods were still on hand, having but lately been delivered to the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pelzer, Rodgers & Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
  2. Keeter v. Bank of EllijaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Cohen & Co. v. Morris & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  4. Guilmartin v. Middle Georgia & Atlantic Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Slack v. CollinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API