Legal Opinion

Hughes v. New York Life Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1903No. 4474PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Wildiam R. Bede, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fullerton, C. J.

The appellant is the widow of Archie Hughes, deceased, and the respondent is a life insurance company. On August 27, 1898, Archie Hughes made application to the respondent, through its agent at North Yakima, in this state, for a policy of insurance for the sum of $1,500 on the company’s “Ordinary Life, 20 Year Accumulation Plan,” with premium return equal to. all premiums paid, paying to the agent the first premiums of $41.25, who gave him a receipt therefor acknowledging the payment, and agreeing to return the amount paid in case the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Warder v. BakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Frei v. McMurdoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Peck v. PeckWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Hustad v. ReedMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Woodworth v. School District No. 2Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Iles v. Mutual Reserve Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Bankers Trust Co. v. American Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API