Legal Opinion · Dissent

Duty v. Arkansas Judicial Discipline & Disability Commission

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 21, 1990No. 90-172Published

1DissentSteele Hays, Justice

The majority chooses to interpret Rule 12F of the Rules of Procedure of the Arkansas Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission narrowly, suggesting that this court can only review the actions of the Commission on appeal by a judge or when a petitioner can show an error on the face of the record. While that may be one basis for certiorari, it is only that, and the word “certiorari” has greater flexibility than the majority opinion implies. Hardin, Commissioner of Revenue v. Norsworthy, County Judge, 204 Ark. 943, 165 S.W.2d 609 (1942); McCain v. Collins, 204 Ark. 521, 164 S.W.2d 448…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burgett v. AppersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
  2. McCain, Labor Commissioner v. CollinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  3. Hardin, Comm. of Revenues v. Norsworthy, Co. JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  4. McAllister v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  5. Ex parte PhillipsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API