Legal Opinion

Eversole v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 9, 1956PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOGG, Judge.

Ora Eversole and Maurice Raisor- were-jointly indicted and charged with the crime of1 grand larceny — the larceny of one coca cola cooler, two thermos jugs, food, a Waltham wristwatch, and a. Kodak camera, the personal property of Charles Jack Davis and Jack Latimer. On his trial, Ever-sole was convicted and his punishment fixed at imprisonment' in the penitentiary for one year. He appeals, urging a reversal upon two grounds: (1) The evidence was insuf-. ficient either to take the case to the jury or to sustain- the verdict. (2) The trial court made a prejudicial statement to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  2. Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  3. Nichols v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
  4. Buckles v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  5. Blanton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Amill Andrew Smith v. Dewey Sowders, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. Colonial Stores, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  3. Fair v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Lair v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  5. Fair v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API