Legal Opinion

Long Bell Lumber Co. v. Chicago Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1914Published

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon. Jas. E. Goodrich, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

In substance the cause of action alleged in the petition is the conversion by defendant, a common carrier, of a carload of shingles belonging to plaintiff. The answer interposes defenses the nature of which will appear in our statement and discussion of the case. A jury was waived and after hearing the evidence the court rendered judgment for plaintiff and defendant appealed.

Plaintiff is an extensive wholesale and retail, dealer in lumber and one of its retail yards is at Wichita, Kansas. The manager of that yard was not restricted to purchasing lumber from plaintiff’s wholesale department…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Letts-Spencer Grocery Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Estey v. TruxelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API