State Highway Commissioner v. Goodman
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
(for reversal). The facts in this case are simple. The plaintiff, State highway commissioner, condemned various parcels of property belonging to the defendants for State highway purposes under the'State statute authorizing such action, being PA 1925, No 352 (CL 1948, § 213.171 et seq. [Stat Ann and Stat Ann 1955 Cum Supp § 8.171 et seq.)). In . the course of the condemnation suit before the commissioners who took the testimony, defendants employed certain witnesses to give expert testimony as to the value of their property. Subsequent thereto, on motion by defendants-appellees heroin, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Department of Conservation v. ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Department of Conservation v. ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Highway Commissioner v. RoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
- Cope v. City of St. ClairMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- City of Holland v. GreenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- State Highway Commission v. FrederickMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Commonwealth Transportation Commission v. CoffeyFairfax County Circuit Court · 1993