Legal Opinion

State v. Esquivel

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 7, 1993No. 12292-1-III; 12303-1-IIIPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, C. J.

The issue in these linked cases is whether use of a falsified government document in response to a police request for identification constitutes forgery under RCW 9A.60.020(l)(b). In both cases, defendants presented documents they admit were not authentic. However, the trial court determined that, as a matter of law, the State could not prove their intent to defraud the officers. As to Ramiro Esquivel, two counts of forgery were dismissed. As to Enrique Luna, the trial court refused to find probable cause for issuance of an arrest warrant for forgery. We vacate the orders entered in both…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BergeronWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. MarkWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. LutesWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. State v. ScobyWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. LadelyWashington Supreme Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. VasquezWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. WassonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. MiraldaColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Stalter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. State v. TinajeroCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API