Legal Opinion
Thorndale Mercantile Co. v. Continental Gin Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 17, 1922No. 799PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from District Court, Milam County; John Watson, Judge. Suit by the Continental Gin Company against the Thorndale Mercantile Company and others. From an order denying motions of defendant named praying that it be relieved from liability under judgment, and that execution issued on judgment for plaintiff be recalled and canceled, defendant named appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
On the 22d day of March, 1921, in cause No. 7253, Continental Gin Company v. Redville Gin Company et al. on the docket of the district court of Milam county, the Continental Gin Company sued out the following execution:
“The State of Texas to the Sheriff. or any Constable of Milam County — Greeting.
“Whereas, on the 28th day of January,-1918, the Continental fen Company, a private corporation, recovered a judgment in cause No. 7253, in the district court of Milam county, Tex., against the Redviile Gin Company, a private corporation, for the.sum of §3,347.90, with interest from that- date at the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bailey v. BlockTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- Bryan v. BridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1851
- Unknown Heirs of Tutt v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Henry Wife v. Red Water Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1907
- Scott v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1846
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Continental Gin Co. v. Thorndale Mercantile Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Dixie Gas & Fuel Co. v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- McHone v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Motors Insurance Corp. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- American Nat. Ins. Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.