Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Wilson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1978No. 49229PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moran

Following a bench trial in the circuit court of Cook County, the defendants, Wallace Wilson and Kim Kimberley, were convicted of having violated section 192 — 8 of the Municipal Code of the city of Chicago (Code), which prohibits a person from wearing clothing of the opposite sex with the intent to conceal his or her sex. Each defendant was fined $100. The appellate court affirmed (44 Ill. App. 3d 620), and this court granted leave to appeal.

Defendants were arrested on February 18, 1974, minutes after they emerged from a restaurant where they had had breakfast. Defendant Wilson was wearing a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Kelley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Robert Richards, Jr., a Minor by His Father and Next Friend Robert Richards v. Roger Thurston, as Principal of Marlboro High SchoolCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  5. East Hartford Education Association v. Board of Education of the Town of East HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. MoralesIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Lopez v. River Oaks Imaging & Diagnostic Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
  3. Doe v. McConnDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1980
  4. City of Chicago v. AbdullahAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Hodge Ex Rel. Hodge v. LyndDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API