Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Clemens

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1910No. Docket No. 16PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Cheboygan; Shepherd, J. Assumpsit by David Bowen against Jerome T. Clemens for rent. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

On the 9th day of October, 1905, one Carl Theis rented lot 5 in block 3 of the village of Tower, and all buildings thereon, for the term of six years from and after May 1, 1904, to be occupied for saloon purposes, at the stated price of $25 per month for the property. The lease contained the usual covenant for quiet enjoyment, and a covenant on the part of the lessee to keep the premises in the usual repair; damage by the elements excepted. After the making of this lease, the defendant entered into ’possession of the premises and occupied the same according to the terms of the lease until the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lieberthal v. MontgomeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Chesebrough v. PingreeMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wood v. BartolinoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Japhet v. PolemanakosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Minnis v. Newbro-Gallogly Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Nederlander v. Cadillac Clay Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API