Hall v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
In this direct criminal appeal, appellant challenges both his convictions and his sentences. We conclude that the challenge to the convictions lacks merit. Accordingly, we affirm the convictions without further discussion. However, because it appears from the *407face of the record that three convictions scored under “prior record” for purposes of computing the guidelines scoresheet were pending before this court on direct appeal at the time of sentencing, we vacate appellant’s sentences and remand to the trial court for resentencing using a recalculated scoresheet which omits those three…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Peterson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. HallSupreme Court of Florida · 1996