Legal Opinion

Hall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 18, 1995No. 94-4140PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this direct criminal appeal, appellant challenges both his convictions and his sentences. We conclude that the challenge to the convictions lacks merit. Accordingly, we affirm the convictions without further discussion. However, because it appears from the *407face of the record that three convictions scored under “prior record” for purposes of computing the guidelines scoresheet were pending before this court on direct appeal at the time of sentencing, we vacate appellant’s sentences and remand to the trial court for resentencing using a recalculated scoresheet which omits those three…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peterson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HallSupreme Court of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API