State Ex Rel. Malott v. Board of County Commissioners
Montana Supreme Court
1Dissent
MR. JUSTICE GALEN:
I dissent with respect to the second subdivision of the opinion, holding that the bonds do not constitute general obligations of the district. The statute requires that “all the lands in the district at the time said bonds are issued, and all lands subsequently included which are so chargeable under the provisions of this Act, shall he and remain liable to be taxed and assessed for the payment of said bonds and interest. * * * In the event that for any reason any special tax or assessment hereinabove provided for cannot or shall not be levied and collected in time to meet…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Head v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Wurts v. HoaglandSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Norris v. Montezuma Valley Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- State ex rel. Clancy v. Columbia Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.