Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Jordan

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1979Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Allen Murray Myers, J.

Both parties agree that all the material facts are before the court, the facts are undisputed and that, therefore, the issue between them can be resolved as a matter of law. Both have moved for summary judgment.

*687FACTS

Defendant, Jackson Jordan, is and admittedly for several years has been a resident of North Miami, Florida, where she owns her own home, resides all year around, where she votes, and where she has been granted a homestead exemption as a domiciliary of Florida.

In 1950, defendant Jordan, having been a tenant since 1948, of a penthouse…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wasservogel v. MeyerowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Fairfield Lease Corp. v. Marsi Dress Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1969
  3. Bohmfalk v. ZimaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1968
  4. Johnson v. 323 East 9th Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API