Legal Opinion

Benham v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1888No. 14,398PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From the Wayne Circuit Court

1Opinion of the CourtHowe, J.

The indictment in this case charged that appellant, Benham, at Wayne county, Indiana, “on the 1st day *113of January, 1887, and thence continually from said 1st day of January, 1887, until the 1st day of September, 1887, did practice medicine without having first procured fróm the clerk of the circuit court of the said county of Wayne, a license so to do, and he, the said Milton C. Benham, not then and there, nor during any part of said period, having a license so to do according to the laws of the said State, in force at the time, contrary to the form of the statute,” etc.

Upon arraignment the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Eastman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Graeter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. State v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Trout v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Trout v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Parks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Wertheimer & Goldberg v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. People v. DevinnyNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  5. Ferner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API