Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. Prive Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 24, 1998No. 97-10651PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

Linda York appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict against her. Her principal claim is that the trial should not have been allowed to proceed, because the defendant’s legal representative in bankruptcy had previously agreed to a settlement. In the alternative, she argues that the district court made various evidentiary and procedural errors that warrant reversal. We affirm.

I

York and Anne Marie Lindsey brought Age Discrimination in Employment Act claims against Prive Corp., operator of an upscale gentleman’s club, which allegedly refused the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. 78 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1857, 50 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 969 Anne Marie Lindsey, Linda Ann York v. Prive Corporation, Doing Business as Cabaret Royale Walhill Partners Ltd. Crc Operating Corporation, Also Known as Dallas Food & Beverage Dnl Corporation, Linda Ann York v. Prive Corporation, Doing Business as Cabaret RoyaleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. Hancock Whitney Bank v. SnA Interests, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2021
  3. Reverse Mortgage Funding, LLC v. HodgeDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2022
  4. Triton Hedron, LLC v. Permaducto S.A. de C.V.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API