Young v. American Diabetes Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
*362OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff David Young appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant American Diabetes Association (“the ADA”), assigning error to the district court’s determination that defendant had just cause for terminating Young under his employment contract. Young sued the ADA, claiming that he was terminated without just cause in violation of his employment agreement and Ohio public policy. The district court, in an order dated June 16, 2000, granted the ADA’s motion for summary judgment on all claims. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Waters v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Robert Fitzke and Joy Fitzke v. Barry Shappell, Deputy Sheriff, and Elwin Smith, Sheriff, of Eaton County, Michigan, Jointly and SeverallyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Zimmerman v. Eagle Mortgage Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Avery v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fendley v. Wright State Univ.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Jackson 748757 v. CoronadoDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2019