Paris v. Patsy Frok & Romper Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Southern District of California; Oscar A. Trippet, Judge. Suit for infringement of patent by the Patsy brok & Romper Company against W. A. Paris and another, individually and as copartners trading under the firm name of the Fifth Street Store. Decree for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Southern District of California; Oscar A. Trippet, Judge. Suit for infringement of patent by the Patsy brok & Romper Company against W. A. Paris and another, individually and as copartners trading under the firm name of the Fifth Street Store. Decree for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. This suit was brought for infringement of plaintiff’s design letters patent No. 54,809, granted March 23, 1920, to William I. Zidell, pursuant to an application filed by him on July 14, 1919, assigned to plaintiff, I’atsy…
1Opinion of the CourtMorrow, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). This appeal is before us upon the following stipulations, entered into by the parties:
“This appeal is taken by the defendants from said decree holding said design letters patent No. 54,809* valid, and it is hereby stipulated that the sole issue to be presented and determined upon this- appeal is whether or not said design letters patent No. 54,809 are valid, in view of said design letters patent No. 52,720. For the purposes of appeal it is stipulated that said William I. Zidell produced, and made a child’s romper in accordance *902with the drawing of patent No.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- James v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Smith v. Whitman Saddle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Rowe v. Blodgett & Clapp Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gladding-McBean Corporation v. N. Clark & SonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Gross v. NorrisDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1927
- Dieterich v. LeafCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
- Eloesser-Heynemann Co. v. Bayly-Underhill Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1928
- In re WhitingCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931