Mazer v. Stedding
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.
The established general rule is that questions of primary and contributory negligence are for the jury. But there is a qualification as well known as the general rule. Particular facts may establish that a defendant has been guilty of negligence or a plaintiff has been guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative Inc. v. Blanchard, 239 Md. 481, 485. The burden of proving negligence is upon the plaintiff and the burden of proving contributory negligence is upon the defendant. Before it can be determined as a matter of law that one has not been…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fowler v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Yommer v. McKenzieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Charles C. Fulton Building Co. v. StichelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
- Sears v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Buchanan v. GalliherCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Stitzel v. KurzCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Kelch v. Mass Transit AdministrationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Whitt v. DynanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Little v. DuncanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.