Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Herman v. Kogan

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 25, 1986No. 85-156Published

1ConcurrenceBaskin, Judge

(specially concurring).

I concur in the majority result, but on different grounds: in my opinion the presumption of undue influence never arose. The trial court ruled that the material allegations challenging the will were unfounded and unproved. Those challenges assert that the will was the product of undue influence by the substantial beneficiary.

A presumption of undue influence arises when a substantial beneficiary under a will occupies a confidential relationship with the testator and actively procures the contested will. In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla.1971); Allen v. Gore,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CarpenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Cripe v. ATLANTIC FIRST NAT. BANK, ETC.Supreme Court of Florida · 1982
  3. McCaslin v. MummeryOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Allen v. GoreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Lehr v. BishopDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API