Legal Opinion

Scariano Bros. v. Backhaus

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 1978No. 8345PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEMMON, Judge.

This is a garnishment proceeding. Plaintiff, the seizing creditor, has appealed from a judgment dismissing its rule which demanded, among other things, that the court render judgment against “Canal Boulevard Supermarket, and its owner, Anthony Caruso”, as garnishee, for the amount due by the judgment debtor because the garnishee failed to withhold any wages after being served with the supplemental petition for garnishment and accompanying interrogatories.

The issue is whether Anthony Caruso was ever made a garnishee.

I

Plaintiff had obtained a judgment against Harold Backhaus. On…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rea v. Dow Motor Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Sun Sales Co. v. HodgesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
  3. Cobb v. BergeronLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rawls v. DamareLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Assensoh v. Diamond NailsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Leonardi v. Dress RackLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API