Scariano Bros. v. Backhaus
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
LEMMON, Judge.
This is a garnishment proceeding. Plaintiff, the seizing creditor, has appealed from a judgment dismissing its rule which demanded, among other things, that the court render judgment against “Canal Boulevard Supermarket, and its owner, Anthony Caruso”, as garnishee, for the amount due by the judgment debtor because the garnishee failed to withhold any wages after being served with the supplemental petition for garnishment and accompanying interrogatories.
The issue is whether Anthony Caruso was ever made a garnishee.
I
Plaintiff had obtained a judgment against Harold Backhaus. On…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rea v. Dow Motor Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
- Sun Sales Co. v. HodgesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
- Cobb v. BergeronLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rawls v. DamareLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Assensoh v. Diamond NailsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- Leonardi v. Dress RackLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984