Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Floyd
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 21, 1982No. 80-624PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Baileys appeal from an adverse judgment in a suit claiming damages against Floyd for obstructing the water flow and seeking injunctive relief in providing adequate drainage of the surface water.
Baileys' counsel states the "Issues Presented" as follows:
"1. Whether Alabama law precludes a lower lot owner of property outside the limits of an incorporated town or city from obstructing the natural now of surface water across the upper lot owner's land and onto the lower lot owner's land.
"2. Whether the trial court's ruling was plainly and palpably erroneous or was based upon an incorrect view…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- King Land & Improvement Co. v. BowenAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
- Kay-Noojin Development Co. v. HackettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Whitfield v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Vinson v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Dekle v. VannSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
3Cited by5 opinions
- Purser v. SOLID GROUND DEVELOPMENT, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Karagan v. City of MobileCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
- Matthew T. Winther v. U.S. Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Purser v. SOLID GROUND DEVELOPMENT, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Winther v. United States Steel CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020