Legal Opinion
Amatruda v. Werner (FID) Co., Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 28, 2020No. 4:19-cv-05446Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHRISTINE AMATRUDA, Case No. 19-cv-05446-PJH 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND GRANTING MOTION 10 WERNER (FID) CO., INC., et al., TO QUASH FOR INSUFFICIENT SERVICE OF PROCESS 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 24, 26 12 13 Defendant Werner Co.’s motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1) and quash service 14 under Rule 12(b)(5) and defendant KLI, Inc.’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss plaintiff 15 Christine Amatruda’s (“plaintiff”) first amended complaint (“FAC”) came on for hearing 16 before this court on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Internet Solutions for Business Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Jeanette Daviton Candi Daviton-Sciandra v. Columbia/hca Healthcare Corporation, Dba San Leandro HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Donald M. Paradis v. A.J. Arave, Warden, Idaho State Penitentiary Al Murphy, Director, Idaho State Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- G.F. Company v. Pan Ocean Shipping Co., Ltd., Aka, Panobulk America, Inc., and Pan Queen, Its Engines, Tackle, Apparel and Furniture Banque IndosuezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.