Legal Opinion

Smith v. Great Southern Federal Savings Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 2, 1987No. 74708PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Judge.

Appellee-plaintiff is the holder of six promissory notes. Appellant-defendants are two of the five guarantors of those notes. When the notes went into default, appellee filed suit against all five of the guarantors. Following discovery and the entry of consent judgments against two of the other guarantors, appellee moved for summary judgment as against appellants only. Appellants appeal from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of appellee.

1. Appellants urge that the trial court’s granting of summary judgment was erroneous in that a genuine issue of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. Citizens & Southern DeKalb BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. Colodny v. Dominion Mortgage & Realty TrustCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. H & H Operations, Inc. v. West Georgia National Bank of CarrolltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Thurmond v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lothridge v. First Nat. Bank of GainesvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  2. Citizens & Southern National Bank v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API