Legal Opinion
Green v. Ludford Fruit Products, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 18, 1941No. 1023PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. F. T. O’CONNOR, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, R. H. Green, A. M. Green, and J. B. Green, doing business as Green & Green, a copartnership, but formerly a corporation, are engaged in the business of marketing concentrates, extracts, and beverages for nonalcoholic carbonated soft drinks. Their principal place of business is Houston, Texas and their principal product is a soft drink known as “Fruit Bowl”, an opaque, reddish carbonated mixture of fruit concentrate, artificial coloring, flavoring, and a small amount of benzoate of soda. Plaintiffs produce other beverages known variously as Golden…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dixi-Cola Laboratories, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Pacific Coast Condensed Milk Co. v. Frye & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. Pepsodent Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- John Vittucci Co. v. MerlineWashington Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hi-Land Dairyman's Ass'n v. Cloverleaf DairyUtah Supreme Court · 1944
- The Creamette Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. Joseph Merlino, a Sole Trader Doing Business as Major Italian Foods CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Green v. Ludford Fruit Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942